CVE-2016-2183 Information
Share on:Description
The DES and Triple DES ciphers as used in the TLS SSH and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode aka a \Sweet32\ attack.
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Reference
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00013.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0336.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0337.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0338.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0462.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92630 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95568 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036696 http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSV http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUE http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1021697 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21991482 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039 https://access.redhat.com/articles/2548661 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1216 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2708 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2709 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2710 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3113 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3114 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3239 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3240 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2123 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1245 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2859 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0451 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2183 https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2016/08/24/attack-of-week-64-bit-ciphers-in-tls/ https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa133 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369383 https://github.com/ssllabs/ssllabs-scan/issues/387issuecomment-242514633 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbgn03765en_us https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbux03725en_us https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05302448 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05309984 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05323116 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05349499 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05356388 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05369403 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05369415 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05385680 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05390722 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05390849 https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10171 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10310 https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2016/08/25/anatomy-of-a-cryptographic-collision-the-sweet32-attack/ https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/september-2016-security-releases/ https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-16 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-65 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201707-01 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20160915-0001/ https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170119-0001/ https://sweet32.info/ https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg04560.html https://www.mitel.com/en-ca/support/security-advisories/mitel-product-security-advisory-17-0008 https://www.nccgroup.trust/us/about-us/newsroom-and-events/blog/2016/august/new-practical-attacks-on-64-bit-block-ciphers-3des-blowfish/ https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2016/08/24/sweet32/ https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html https://www.sigsac.org/ccs/CCS2016/accepted-papers/ https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16 https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20 https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21 https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09 https://www.teskalabs.com/blog/teskalabs-bulletin-160826-seacat-sweet32-issue
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction Required
NONE
Scope
NONE
Confidentiality Impact
UNCHANGED
Integrity Impact
HIGH
Availability Impact
NONE
Base Score
NONE
Base Severity
7.5